Join the movement to end censorship by Big Tech. StopBitBurning.com needs donations and support.
Pakistan accuses India of planning imminent attack as U.S. races to prevent nuclear crisis
By isabelle // 2025-05-01
Mastodon
    Parler
     Gab
 
  • India and Pakistan are on the brink of a major military conflict, with Pakistan claiming it has intelligence of an imminent Indian strike within 24 to 36 hours.
  • Tensions escalated after a deadly Kashmir attack, which India blames on Pakistan, prompting Modi to authorize military retaliation.
  • Pakistan warns of a "decisive response" to any Indian aggression, while India is accusing Pakistan of staging a false flag operation.
  • The U.S. is urgently mediating, with Rubio urging de-escalation as both nations engage in military posturing and cross-border shelling.
  • The standoff risks spurring a regional war, with global powers fearing nuclear escalation and scrambling to prevent a catastrophe.
The already volatile relationship between nuclear-armed rivals India and Pakistan has reached a dangerous tipping point, with Islamabad claiming it possesses "credible intelligence" that New Delhi plans a military strike within 24 to 36 hours. The accusation follows a deadly terrorist attack in India-administered Kashmir that killed 26 tourists, which Prime Minister Narendra Modi has blamed on Pakistan. With both nations exchanging artillery fire and closing airspace, the U.S. has launched urgent diplomatic efforts to prevent a catastrophic escalation. Pakistan’s Information Minister Attaullah Tarar took to social media to issue a chilling warning: “Pakistan has credible intelligence that India intends to launch a military strike within the next 24 to 36 hours, using the Pahalgam incident as a false pretext.” He added, “Any act of aggression will be met with a decisive response. India will be fully responsible for any serious consequences in the region.” The threat came after Modi granted India’s military “full operational freedom” to retaliate for the Kashmir attack, which New Delhi alleges was backed by Pakistan. Indian forces have since launched multiple anti-terror operations in Jammu and Kashmir, while Modi vowed to punish “the terrorists and their backers.” Pakistan, however, denies involvement and has accused India of staging a false flag operation in a claim dismissed by Indian officials as “baseless allegations.”

U.S. steps in amid fears of regional war

Recognizing the potential for a conflict that could draw in neighboring Iran and China, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held emergency calls with Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar. The State Department urged both nations to “de-escalate tensions, re-establish direct communications, and maintain peace.” Rubio emphasized the need for Pakistan to cooperate in investigating the Kashmir attack, calling it “unconscionable.” Sharif, meanwhile, pushed back, asking the U.S. to pressure India to “dial down the rhetoric.” The Pakistani leader reiterated his country’s willingness to participate in a neutral probe, while India’s Jaishankar demanded justice for the “perpetrators, backers, and planners” of the attack.

Military posturing and global concerns

The rhetoric between the two sides has been matched by military readiness. Pakistan’s army chief, Gen. Asim Munir, oversaw combat drills in Punjab, declaring, “Let there be no ambiguity: any military misadventure by India will be met with a swift, resolute, and notch-up response.” India, meanwhile, has suspended a critical water-sharing treaty with Pakistan and closed borders, while both sides report nightly cross-border shelling. The U.S. faces a delicate balancing act. India is a key ally in countering China, while Pakistan remains a strategic partner despite frayed ties post-Afghanistan withdrawal. With Qatar also offering mediation, the international community is scrambling to prevent a conflict that could destabilize an already tense region. The India-Pakistan standoff is more than a bilateral dispute; it’s a global security risk. With nuclear capabilities, historical grievances, and competing alliances, the slightest miscalculation could trigger a disaster. As Washington and other nations push for restraint, one can only hope that diplomacy will prevail before the next bomb drops. Sources for this article include: SHTFPlan.com NBCNews.com APNews.com
Mastodon
    Parler
     Gab