COVID-1984: WHO changes official definition of "herd" immunity to remove natural immunity
Before the advent of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), the World Health Organization (WHO) acknowledged the fact that so-called "herd" immunity can be achieved naturally through our God-built immune systems. Post WuFlu, however, the WHO suddenly now claims
that herd immunity can only be achieved through mass vaccination.
This monumental shift comes as President Donald Trump's "Operation Warp Speed" COVID-19 vaccines are being mass distributed all across the country. Vice President Mike Pence
and others in positions of power are busily pretending to get jabbed on live television in order to manipulate the "herd" into getting jabbed, all for the alleged purpose of eradicating the virus through vaccine-induced herd immunity.
According to the WHO's new definition
of herd immunity, which it also calls "population immunity," a certain "threshold of vaccination" is necessary to keep people protected from the novel virus.
"Vaccines train our immune systems to create proteins that fight disease, known as 'antibodies,' just as would happen when we are exposed to a disease but – crucially – vaccines work without making us sick," the WHO claims. "Vaccinated people are protected from getting the disease in question and passing it on, breaking any chains of transmission."
According to the WHO in 2020, the human immune system can only work properly if everyone gets vaccinated. There is no more room for natural exposure to disease because only vaccines can protect against harmful pathogens, the globalist entity now insists.
The WHO's old definition of herd immunity clearly delineated that immunity can, in fact, be achieved simply by natural exposure to infection. This is how the body learns how to recognize a pathogen so it can fight it upon all subsequent encounters, either in nature or from an infected person.
"This means that even people who haven't been infected, or in whom an infection hasn't triggered an immune response, they are protected because people around them who are immune can act as buffers between them and an infected person," the old WHO definition for herd immunity explained.
Mainstream "science" hates God, so of course it also hates the immune system He designed
It is important to note that even the WHO's old definition of herd immunity fails to clearly delineate that it can be achieved when enough people within a population become naturally protected against a virus due to having reached a high enough threshold of "community" immunity. The new definition is even worse, though, as it exclusively attributes herd immunity to mass vaccination.
The WHO also now insists that there is no way to achieve herd immunity through natural exposure to a virus. Instead, the United Nations arm contends that people can only be "protected" from a virus by getting vaccinated, which has absolutely no basis in legitimate science.
Changing the definition in this way is the WHO's attempt at rewriting hundreds of years of scientific understanding about immunity. It completely negates the reality that herd immunity can, and very easily could, eradicate the China Virus if only people were allowed to naturally encounter it while supporting their own immune systems.
This is what Sweden did, with notable success. Belarus did the same, even without socialistic distancing and mandatory mouth muzzles. These two countries will have eradicated COVID-19 without ever having to push vaccines on their populations, which is great considering the jabs are actively harming people and even giving them HIV
"This is dangerous antiscientific drivel from the WHO," tweeted someone named Christian Duncan who claims to be a surgeon. "Herd immunity is the reason that every animal in history has not died out from the many infectious diseases that surrounded them. For the overwhelming majority of that time, none had access to vaccines."
To keep up with the latest news about the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), check out Pandemic.news
Sources for this article include: